GUNS N’ ROSES Sued Over Copyright Infringement, Supervisor Sued For Disturbing Office Harassment

The final word dream of each live performance photographer out there’s to be introduced with the chance to develop into a tour photographer for an enormous band. Nonetheless, it appears that evidently goals can even flip into nightmares if we’re to consider the main points uncovered in a lawsuit unleashed by ex-Guns N’ Roses photographer Katarina Benzova.

The authorized battle entails claims of copyright infringement and unsettling office sexual harassment. Benzova contends that the band and its administration, Crew Brazil, falsely asserted possession over a considerable variety of her pictures, unleashing a storm of unauthorized makes use of throughout numerous media platforms. The lawsuit alleges not solely copyright infringement but in addition a office atmosphere “fully devoid of any sexual harassment coverage, sexual harassment handbook, sexual harassment coaching, and human useful resource division”, that left Benzova weak to unwelcome advances from Guns N’ Roses‘s supervisor, Fernando Lebeis.

Benzova‘s lawsuit involves mild after Guns N’ Roses filed their very own lawsuit towards Benzova within the Central District Of California on Oct. 24 for declaratory aid. Metallic Injection was supplied with a replica of the doc which states: “Ms. Benzova was initially contracted to offer tour images providers for Guns N’ Roses in 2010. She labored with the band for 12 years and was paid and handled terribly effectively. It was solely after her providers had been discontinued in 2022 that she tried to say possession in photographs which her contract clearly states are owned by the band. The band takes some of these claims very severely nevertheless all proof establishes these accusations are categorically and unequivocally false. This response from her comes after the band initiated go well with towards Ms. Benzova for falsely asserting possession within the photographs of the band.”

Benzova‘s lawsuit – however – paints an image of her 12-year stint as a freelancer for the band, emphasizing the shortage of formal contracts throughout substantial intervals. She contends that, throughout these uncontracted intervals, she was the only proprietor of her pictures and secured 180 Copyright registrations for her work. Nonetheless, throughout those self same intervals, the band and Crew Brazil shamelessly “commercialized at the least 145 of her pictures” with out authorization, resulting in widespread infringement throughout numerous mediums. As well as, she can also be looking for a court docket order that can declare her “the only proprietor” of the photographs she took since 2010, the interval she wasn’t sure to a written contract.

Benzova claims that Guns N’ Roses and Crew Brazil made a behavior of routinely infringing upon her copyright and that of others, including that Lebeis as soon as admitted to “knowingly and deliberately infringing upon” her copyrights, “stating that he knew however was too lazy to offer her credit score,” or allegedly going even additional to say “she did not want credit score as a result of everybody already knew that she was the photographer of Guns N’ Roses.”

Including a darker observe to the authorized symphony, Benzova alleges a disturbing sample of sexual harassment by Lebeis, involving undesirable advances, express messages, and even unsettling makes an attempt to pressure himself onto her “making an attempt to pressure her to kiss him.” Benzova asserts that her rejection of Lebeis‘s advances resulted in a collection of retaliatory actions, together with monetary repercussions – reducing her compensation, withholding cash owed to her – and demotions; reserving her in cheaper motels; demanding she would pay for flights Crew Brazil had allegedly already agreed to pay for; and extra. Benzova‘s claims painting a poisonous dynamic the place makes an attempt to claim her rights had been met with stonewalling, gaslighting, and psychological manipulation.

Whether or not this authorized conflict would be the crescendo to Guns N’ Roses‘ legacy or a mere backstage drama stays to be seen. The allegations, if confirmed, may tarnish the band’s repute and immediate a reevaluation of the trade’s remedy of photographers and freelancers. Within the period of #MeToo and heightened consciousness, the highlight on office harassment and copyright battles could pressure Guns N’ Roses to confront not simply authorized penalties but in addition a possible shift in public notion.